Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Multilingual Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District Multilingual Office Reports Procedures, Seal of Biliteracy Trends and Vendor Pause on Testing
Summary
The district's multilingual office briefed the board on program models, slight enrollment declines, Seal of Biliteracy testing delays caused by vendor data-sharing concerns, and steps to tighten intake and placement procedures; the director emphasized cross-department collaboration and teacher recruitment.
The multilingual department presented a yearlong summary of services, program models and recent trends to the Waterbury Board of Education.
The department head (introduced at the meeting) described the district's multilingual programs (ESL, bilingual sites, transitional models and newcomer instruction) and noted that multilingual enrollment has declined slightly in line with statewide patterns. "We are one of the districts who offers multiple opportunities for students to acquire English," the director told the board, while also stressing that bilingual and ESL models are structured differently by level.
On the Seal of Biliteracy, the director said testing has been disrupted after a vendor required a data-sharing agreement the district's legal team flagged for review. "We had to stop testing with that company," the director said, and the department is onboarding a different testing vendor whose code distribution process is slower; preliminary testing of more than 100 seniors was underway at the time of the presentation.
The presentation outlined procedural updates for multilingual learner intake, placement guides for middle and high school, and clearer protocols for changing multilingual support services. The director said the district had reduced bilingual teacher vacancies in elementary bilingual sites from eight to two by making targeted recruitment outreach and paying for cross-endorsement programs that prepare teachers for bilingual certification.
Board members questioned the data-sharing pause and whether the district could test for any language; the director said assessments can be developed and administered for any language if needed, with state consultation.
Several commissioners asked whether sign language counts; the director confirmed sign language testing and noted examples of students who have already earned biliteracy recognition. The director closed by describing short-term curriculum reviews for middle/high school ESL and longer-term goals to expand parental supports and refine multilingual career pathways with district supervisors.
The board did not take formal action at the workshop; commissioners asked for follow-up documentation about vendor agreements and testing schedules.
