Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture And Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee narrows "accessory on‑farm business" rules and delays effective date in H 03/25 conference report
Summary
The Senate Natural Resources & Energy committee reviewed the conference committee report for H 03/25, narrowing the definition of accessory on‑farm business events (requiring a qualifying product, 10 p.m. end time, and a 70‑decibel boundary limit) and agreeing to delay the bills effective date by one year to allow more public input.
The Natural Resources & Energy committee reviewed the conference committee report for H 03/25 and agreed to tighten rules for "accessory on‑farm business events," including a requirement that such events feature a qualifying product, must end by 10:00 p.m., and be no louder than 70 decibels at property boundaries. Chair (speaking for the committee) said the language drew substantially from prior work in H 128 (2024) and acknowledged additional public input would likely be necessary.
Members discussed two timing options for implementation: making the provisions effective immediately but with a sunset to force further review, or delaying effectiveness by one year to gather more input. The committee chose the latter, meaning the accessory‑event provisions will take effect one year after enactment if not otherwise revisited.
The conference report also implements the Houses repeal of a "tier 3" provision and the related road rule, removes the tier 2 report and replaces it with a new review focused on accessory on‑farm businesses, and keeps tier 1 intact. The report adds tasks for natural resource conservation districts and the Vermont Council on Rural Development to develop a plan to engage Vermonters on preventing loss of working lands and includes a joint oversight committee for the Land Use Review Board intended to improve communication and statutory interpretation. The oversight committee was added with a limited sunset noted in the report.
The chair said some floor amendments (including a reworked Madras amendment) remain in modified form, while other amendments (described in the record as the Venns amendment) were removed because they could have created projects that bypass required review. The committees approach aims to balance clarity for on‑farm events with maintaining municipal review tools.
The committee reviewed a section‑by‑section side‑by‑side of House changes and discussed language clarifications, including definitions and examples added by the House. The chair said she would share the package and follow up with colleagues and staff for further comment.
