Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvement Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tulare Planning Commission affirms consistency finding for five-year Capital Improvement Program
Summary
The commission voted to find the projects listed in the city's five-year Capital Improvement Program consistent with the general plan, a procedural step required before funding allocations; commissioners asked staff about funding responsibility for projects such as an airport runway pavement study.
The Tulare Planning Commission on May 26 unanimously approved a finding that the projects listed in the city's five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are consistent with the general plan, a routine step taken annually before the city adopts a budget.
Planning staff explained that the CIP lists both "existing" projects carried from the previous year without identified funding and "new" projects proposed for prioritization as funds become available. Staff told commissioners the CIP is updated each year prior to budget adoption and that, depending on the project, funding decisions are made by different bodies (the Board of Public Utilities for utility-funded projects and the City Council for general-fund items).
Commissioners asked for clarification about examples on the list, including an airport runway pavement management study. Staff said the CIP does not itself appropriate funds; it makes projects eligible for funding once the CIP lists them and the relevant funding body allocates money.
A motion to accept item 5.2 (the CIP consistency finding) was made and seconded, and the commission recorded a unanimous voice/roll-call vote. The recorded vote on the motion listed the commissioners present as voting "aye." The commission did not adopt funding allocations as part of this action; those would require separate votes by the Board of Public Utilities or City Council when funding is identified.
The commission then moved on to public-hearing items on the agenda.
