Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves septic setback variance for 31 Darling Street with conditions after neighbor concerns

Acushnet Board of Health · October 2, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Acushnet’s Board of Health approved a variance reducing the septic setback at 31 Darling Street from 10 feet to 6 feet, contingent on a poly barrier installed on three sides, the vent moved 10 feet from the lot line, and submission of a revised plan; neighbors raised concerns about leakage and pump access.

The Acushnet Board of Health approved a requested variance for a septic system at 31 Darling Street, voting to allow the setback to be reduced from the usual 10 feet to 6 feet with conditions meant to reduce leakage risk and clarify access for maintenance.

During the public hearing, the presenter explained the proposed system and noted favorable soil (sand and gravel) at the site. A resident objected to locating the system near a temporary storage area and said, "I guess my only concern is, you know leakage," expressing worry about the tank and future access for pumping. Board members asked for and received technical details about the design: the barrier material (described as a heavy plastic, "40 millimeters") and vent placement. A board member said the board would require the poly barrier to be installed on three sides rather than two to better protect adjacent crawl spaces.

The chair moved to approve the variances with the stated conditions: the poly barrier installed on three sides (instead of two), the vent relocated to be 10 feet from the lot line, and submission of a revised plan reflecting those changes. The board accepted the motion by voice vote and the motion carried. The board also discussed maintenance expectations for the system, noting the requirement for periodic pumping and a maintenance schedule.

The board concluded that, with the conditions in place and the revised plan submitted, the reduced setback is acceptable given the site’s soil conditions and the engineered safeguards. Residents were told the revised plan will be filed with the board and that routine maintenance remains the property owner’s responsibility.