Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sepsis Protocols topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health Committee advances Stop Sepsis Act after survivors, clinicians urge standardized protocols
Summary
The committee released A1950, the Stop Sepsis Act, after survivors and clinicians testified that standardized sepsis recognition, risk‑adjusted reporting and staff training could save lives; the measure was advanced with committee amendments requiring hospital protocols, reporting and Department of Health oversight.
A majority of the Assembly Health Committee on Thursday advanced A1950, the Stop Sepsis Act, after survivors, physicians and hospital representatives urged lawmakers to standardize sepsis recognition and treatment across New Jersey hospitals.
The bill, as amended by the committee, requires hospitals to establish sepsis recognition and treatment protocols covering adult, geriatric, obstetric and pediatric patients and adds risk‑adjusted reporting to produce an annual hospital report card on sepsis‑related quality measures. The amendments also require staff training and specify data submission through the National Healthcare Safety Network.
"Sepsis is a serious and life threatening condition that requires rapid recognition and immediate treatment," said Christine Stearns of the New Jersey Hospital Association, who told the committee hospitals have increased early sepsis identification and support provisions that prevent payers from second‑guessing clinicians. The association also supported language protecting clinical judgment from retrospective payer denials.
Survivors and family members framed the bill as a life‑saving measure. "I stand before you not only to serve as a proxy for Clemson's voice, but for the voices of all other children whose fate can be altered by this bill," said Sherwin Tsai, who recounted his infant son's death and urged lawmakers to act.
Clinical experts testified that standardized, risk‑adjusted reporting would allow fair comparisons among hospitals and that most electronic health records capture the needed data, limiting additional administrative burden. "The bill's risk adjusted mortality reporting ensures hospitals are evaluated fairly by accounting for differences in patient complexity and severity of illness," one advocate said during testimony.
Committee members pressed witnesses on implementation and training. Supporters pointed to improvements in early identification since 2018 and argued that clearer protocols coupled with education and transparent reporting would reduce variation in care.
On a motion to release A1950 as amended, the committee voted to advance the bill to the next stage of consideration.
The committee action sends A1950 forward with amendments that specify scope, reporting channels and training; the bill will proceed through the legislative process for additional committee consideration and floor action.
