Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors and players press competing safety and cost arguments over Memorial Park pickleball barriers
Summary
At a Cupertino Planning Commission meeting, residents and players clashed over how to reduce pickleball noise at Memorial Park: supporters urged a $150,000 attenuation project to preserve access, while others warned that tall opaque panels could block sight lines for first responders and urged transparent alternatives and testing.
A divided but constructive debate over noise mitigation for the Memorial Park pickleball courts dominated public comment and commissioner discussion at the Cupertino Planning Commission's May 26 meeting.
Multiple speakers representing players and neighbors urged the commission to support a proposed $150,000 capital investment to install sound attenuation at the courts. "The proposed sound attenuation project represents a balanced, constructive, and forward looking solution that addresses neighborhood concerns while preserving equitable public access to this valuable recreational amenity," said Robert George, a Cupertino homeowner who testified in favor of the project.
Supporters argued that attenuation would allow the city to restore more flexible play hours for working residents and maintain an inclusive recreation resource. Jeff Ronny, who said he administers a 950'member pickleball group, said many players depend on early-morning and late-evening hours for exercise and community.
Opponents and cautions focused on safety, visibility and design. One commenter, Hank, argued that an opaque 10'foot acoustic barrier could create a visually blocked enclosure that would impede first responders and raise safety risks for older users. "The city should not create a condition where elderly users are playing inside a visually screened court area and first responders cannot immediately assess medical emergencies from outside the fence," Hank said.
Staff responded that the city will require an acoustic analysis and likely structural upgrades to the existing fence before installing panels. Public Works Director Chad Moseley noted vendor and staff cost differences and cautioned against viewing a vendor'provided per'square'foot price as the final budget: "At the price that they were providing, it's probably closer to $35,000. And that's just to purchase it. That doesn't include delivery, installation, anything else," Moseley said.
Commissioners asked staff to investigate transparent panel options, consult law enforcement and first responders about sight lines, and pursue a pilot that includes neighbor notice and post'pilot feedback before making capital commitments. Commissioner Rao, who moved to endorse the CIP and asked staff to expedite the pickleball pilot, said external case studies and vendor data should be considered but stressed that vetting and multiple options must be retained.
Staff said they would add an acoustic analysis, structural engineering evaluation and first'responder outreach to the project scope and would notify nearby residents about any pilot. The commission's motion endorsing the CIP included a request that staff "expedite" the pilot where feasible while maintaining thorough evaluation and competitive procurement.
Next steps: staff will complete technical studies, consult law enforcement and report back with cost estimates and a recommended procurement approach before any construction or budget appropriation.
