Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Livingston County commissioners approve intergovernmental agreement, staffing and funding items (May 26, 2026)
Summary
At its May 26 meeting the Livingston County Board of Commissioners approved a package of routine resolutions and funding measures — including an intergovernmental building‑services agreement, budget and staffing changes, and opioid settlement funding for the county adult drug court — all by unanimous votes.
The Livingston County Board of Commissioners approved several resolutions and routine county business items in a session marked by unanimous votes and multiple public comments on other matters.
Key votes recorded at the meeting included:
- Intergovernmental agreement to provide building department services to the Village of Weberville: adopted by voice vote, recorded 9–0.
- Change in 2026 budgeted driver positions: adopted after roll call; unanimous support.
- Addition of one full‑time court security officer position: adopted by roll call vote, 9–0 (moved by Commissioner Gross).
- Authorization to submit the community corrections plan application for FY 2027 to the Michigan Department of Corrections: approved unanimously.
- Allocation of opioid settlement funds for the Livingston County Adult Drug Court (amended and substituted resolution): board approved substitution and the amended resolution 9–0.
- Levying the 2026 allocation to the village (specific text on record): approved by roll call, 9–0.
- Approval of claims dated 05/26/2026 and payables dated 04/27–05/10/2026: approved unanimously.
Where roll‑call was used, the transcript records 'yes' votes from all commissioners present. Several measures were advanced after brief committee discussion; a small set of items had additional procedural motions (an amendment and substitution for the opioid settlement funding resolution and a reconsideration and amendment to add chair signature authority to an intergovernmental agreement). The board completed its agenda and adjourned.
The meeting record does not list fiscal amounts for the new court security position or full contract details for the Weberville agreement on the portion of the transcript supplied; the board did not discuss dollar figures for those items in the on‑record comments captured here.
