Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Attendance Buyback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School committee debates attendance "buyback" in second reading; third reading set for June 5
Summary
Weymouth School Committee spent over an hour debating an attendance "buyback" proposal that would let students with five unexcused absences in a term recover a term grade by attending consecutive school days; the committee agreed to a third reading June 5 and signaled a preference for piloting the program with more data and outreach.
At its May meeting the Weymouth School Committee reopened a second reading of the Weymouth High School student handbook to consider an "attendance buyback" option meant to help students recover lost term credit.
Administrators described the buyback as a narrowly targeted remedy: eligibility would begin when a student accrues five unexcused absences in a term, the buyback could be completed by attending seven consecutive school days (or equivalent makeup work), and the district would allow the buyback only once per school year. The administration said the procedure would not change state attendance reporting to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE).
The policy drew sharply different views from committee members. An administrator who reviewed case studies said the buyback had raised grades for both a high-achieving student and a high-risk student in the pilot, arguing the program can "help this past year" for certain students. Chair Nardone proposed a compromise after prolonged debate: "I would be in favor of letting this go as a pilot in the proper procedures for the coming school year 25–26 rather than putting it in our handbook right now," he said, and the committee agreed to table final action for a third reading on June 5.
Opponents urged caution. One member said the policy risked "making excuses for not getting out of bed," and questioned whether codifying buyback in the handbook would lower expectations for the broader student body or create administrative burden for teachers and deans. Members pressed administrators for clarifications on documentation (how consecutive days are tracked), applicability to Career & Technical Education programs (administration said CTE students are included), and how the district would record buyback activity in its systems.
Administrators recommended several safeguards: limiting the buyback to a single use per year, requiring signed teacher checklists to verify completed makeup work, logging the completion with the attendance office, and surveying students and parents as part of a pilot. The committee also requested additional input from school councils and suggested inviting students or parents to testify at the third reading.
The committee did not vote on the handbook changes. The buyback proposal will return for a third reading and possible pilot-design vote at the June 5 meeting.
