Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Englewood council adopts fourth-round affordable-housing obligation after consultant'led correction
Summary
After a presentation by planner John Sabo, the council voted 4'to'1 to adopt a resolution accepting the city'level fourth'round affordable housing obligation (present need 166 units; prospective need set at 331 units), with one council member voting no and public calls for more transparency.
John Sabo, a senior planner retained by the city, told the council Tuesday that the state'mandated fourth'round affordable housing obligation for Englewood is composed of present need and prospective need calculated from three statutory factors: equalized nonresidential valuation, income capacity and land'use capacity. Sabo said the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) initially identified a prospective need of 381 units and a present need of 166 units, but a site'level review reduced the countable developable acreage and revised the prospective need to 331 units.
The council adopted resolution 050012125, with corrections requested during the meeting to fix typographical errors in the draft (the consultant-calculated prospective need was 331 but printed as 329 in multiple places). The vote on the resolution was 4 yes, 1 no: Councilwoman David voted no; Councilmen Rosenzweig, Tokayor and Wilson and Council President Wissotsky voted yes.
Why it matters: Municipalities that participate in the state program and obtain a certification have procedural protections that can reduce the risk of builders'remedy lawsuits and limit how courts might alter local zoning. Sabo emphasized that adopting the resolution preserves Englewood's right to participate and to file a declaratory judgment action (the statute requires adoption by Jan. 31 and filing within 48 hours; objections to the municipal filing are due Feb. 28). If a municipality does not adopt the resolution and pursue certification, Sabo warned, it remains exposed to legal challenges that can undercut local zoning control.
Council members and residents pressed on several technical and public'process points. Several members asked whether a structural condition ("windshield") survey could change the present'need count; Sabo said municipalities may conduct such a survey to verify or adjust the present'need figure derived from HUD and Census data, and that any verified changes become part of the housing element and fair share plan. Council members also asked whether newer data (2023) could be used; Sabo said the statute requires use of specified 2022 ACS/HUD inputs so all municipalities are evaluated from the same baseline.
Public comment and transparency concerns were frequent. Residents and at least one council member said the packet and related materials arrived late, asked for a public workshop and said they wanted more opportunities to review the implications for specific neighborhoods. Sabo and staff replied that the night's action establishes the numerical obligation only; specific planning, zoning changes and possible zoning-based remedies will be developed with the planning board and through a public process, including a public forum the council noted will be scheduled in April.
The next steps: The resolution will be posted on the city website within 48 hours as required; any party has until Feb. 28 to file objections under the statutory process. The city and planning board will coordinate follow'up work to produce a housing element and fair share plan by the statutory deadline of June 30, 2025.
Quote: "I would suggest that you adopt the resolution to protect your right to participate and then move forward," Sabo said, noting the tight timetable imposed by recent statutory changes.
The meeting record shows the council adopted the resolution and will proceed to planning'board review and public outreach to develop the implementation plan.
