Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council member demands transparency after reported AG inquiry into CAP 11 stipends
Summary
During council comments on May 26, a council member publicly described an Arizona attorney general letter alleging irregularities in CAP 11 — a city policy that provided a $900 monthly stipend and a $450 monthly car allowance — and called for accountability, repayment if payments were improper and full public disclosure of how the policy was created.
A Glendale council member used the council-comments period on May 26 to press for transparency after what he described as an Arizona attorney general office inquiry into the city's CAP 11 policy.
The council member (voice 7) said he previously placed a council item on the issue and reiterated concerns that CAP 11 — described in the meeting as allowing a $450 monthly car allowance and a $900 monthly stipend (together totaling about $16,200 per year per eligible official) — may have been implemented without proper public notice or formal vote. He said a May 6 letter from the Arizona attorney general’s office alleges potential misuse of public funds, violations of Arizona’s open-meeting law, possible contraventions of the state constitution’s gift clause and that the policy may have functioned as compensation because it was paid as taxable income.
The council member urged that the matter “not remain behind closed doors,” said the document had been emailed to the mayor and called for a public accounting of who created and benefited from the policy and why it was not processed in open session. “If these payments were not legally authorized, the money should be paid back,” he said, adding he would be willing to repay any improper payments he received.
Other council members pushed back, saying public discussion of the policy occurred in workshops and budget meetings and that the attorney general’s review should determine whether violations occurred. The exchange prompted requests for records and for further review of the policy’s origins and implementation.
Next steps suggested on the council floor included waiting for the attorney general’s determination and reviewing relevant public records and minutes to clarify when and how CAP 11 was discussed and implemented.
(Reporting note: the transcript contains the council member's recitation of an attorney general letter and specifics about the policy as presented on the floor. Those allegations are claims reported here as described during council comments and have not been independently verified.)
