Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Lot Size topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates lowering minimum lot size in Residential A district
Summary
Members debated changing the Residential A minimum lot size from the existing 60,000 square feet to smaller thresholds (40,000 or 30,000 suggested), with supporters saying it will slow land consumption and opponents warning of sewer, septic and rural-character concerns; the committee set a medium priority for formal review.
The Acushnet Master Plan Committee debated whether to lower the minimum lot size in the Residential A district, balancing development flexibility with infrastructure and character concerns.
"Review the minimum lot size of the Residential A district to facilitate new development throughout Acushnet," consultant Chris of Serpad read to the group as part of the draft strategies. Committee discussion centered on how quickly the town should change the standard 60,000-square-foot lot requirement and where smaller lots would be appropriate.
One committee member urged an immediate, modest reduction: "All you do is say, we wanna change 60 to 40," the member said, arguing the change could reduce land consumption and allow more housing choices without wholesale redevelopment. Several other members suggested incremental approaches (40,000 or 45,000 square feet as a compromise) rather than a precipitous cut to 30,000.
Opponents cautioned the change would only be feasible where soils and on‑site septic systems (or sewer connections) can support smaller lots. A committee speaker outlined technical safeguards needed before approving higher-density subdivisions: peer‑reviewed water‑pressure and fire‑suppression modeling and on‑site septic feasibility checks. Members repeatedly tied the lot-size discussion to sewer expansion and long-term rates, noting potential taxpayer impacts if sewer connections are required.
The committee did not adopt a bylaw change at the meeting. Instead it assigned the review of the Residential A minimum lot size a medium priority so staff and the planning board can develop specific language, consider overlay or targeted districts, and identify infrastructure dependencies.
Next steps: the consultant will incorporate members' comments and circulate the draft with other chapter edits; committee members asked for two weeks to submit written recommendations before the committee revisits the housing strategies.
