Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Plan Development Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Malta board reviews major PDD rewrite: density, open space and public-benefit rules debated
Summary
Director Jamie O'Neil presented a redlined revision to the Plan Development District code that would remove a workforce-housing mandate, set a 35% lot-coverage cap, a 25% minimum open-space requirement, require a mandatory pre-application town-board workshop and expand applicant-paid notice and escrow requirements; board asked staff to analyze a density cap (135% suggested) and traffic-study controls.
The Malta Town Board examined a substantial redline revision to the town's Plan Development District (PDD) rules, covering density mechanics, required public benefits, open-space minimums, and a new pre-application public workshop requirement.
Jamie O'Neil, the director of building and planning, walked board members through the redlined text and a summary sheet. The draft removes a previously required workforce/retirement-housing provision, eliminates the super-majority threshold to override a negative planning-board recommendation, clarifies how staff will define contiguous lots for large projects, and adds detailed step-by-step concept-plan and development-plan procedures.
Key numeric provisions discussed included a 35% maximum site coverage figure and a 25% minimum open-space requirement (both added after citizen-group input). The draft also proposes separate open-space and recreation fees (examples discussed: $1 per finished floor square foot for commercial projects and $1,000 per residential unit where applicable), with those funds deposited into the town's open-space/reserve accounts and used only for designated purposes.
The board agreed in principle to require one mandatory town-board pre-application workshop at the concept stage to give the public and the board an early opportunity to assess projects before the applicant spends significant funds. The draft also shifts notice and minor administrative burdens onto applicants (mailing certified-notice proof, temporary signage with QR codes) to improve public awareness but raised enforcement concerns if signs remain in place longer than required.
Traffic and density emerged as the most contested topics. Several members urged a firm density cap; some board members recommended a 135% density factor as a starting point while staff said further analysis by subject-matter experts is needed to determine the correct figure. Board members also debated whether the town should pay for independent traffic studies or require applicants to fund engineering escrow so the town's designated engineer can review methodology and results.
The board did not adopt the redline at the workshop and asked staff to run numerical calculations on density and to circulate revised language. A follow-up zoning workshop was scheduled; staff will return with maps, calculations and proposed edits.
Next steps: staff to provide density calculations, revised PDD language and guidance on traffic-study review processes before the next workshop and planned public hearings.
