Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parkland Easement Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Open Space Commission approves revised parkland easement policy with annual rent for new easements
Summary
The Washoe County Open Space and Regional Parks Commission approved updates to its Parkland Easement Policy that add clearer application requirements and an annual rent for new or modified easements (proposed at 3% of appraised/adjusted value with a $200 minimum). The motion passed with two caveats and will be forwarded as required for final action.
Get email alerts on the Parkland Easement Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Washoe County Open Space and Regional Parks Commission voted to approve a revision to the county’s Parkland Easement Policy that adds clearer application requirements and establishes an annual rent for new or modified easements.
Park planner Vamory Pecar told commissioners the policy, originally adopted in 2008 and last revised in 2012, needed updates to streamline staff review, improve transparency and align application fees with the county fee schedule. "We want a predictable, administratively manageable framework" for easement requests, Pecar said, noting the draft asks applicants to provide alternatives, environmental impact information and trail/vegetation impact assessments.
The most substantive change is a proposed annual rent applied only to new or modified easements. Staff presented a framework of 3% of the adjusted or appraised easement value, with a worked example: a $10,000 appraised easement would yield an annual rent of $300 for a five‑year period before a periodic reevaluation. Staff told commissioners the draft includes a $200 annual minimum, and that the adjusted value would be indexed for future updates.
Commissioners asked how the policy would apply in practice. Pecar said most easement requests the department receives are utility‑related (often underground), that the county maintains a preapproved list of appraisers for mutually agreed appraisals, and that the revenues from easement payments would remain within parks rather than going to the general fund. Division director Aaron Smith added that revenue generally would be directed to the impacted park or park district account and that abandonment of easements requires recorded documents and may require Board of County Commissioners (BCC) action depending on the terms of the agreement.
The commission also discussed reclamation requirements. Pecar said reclamation plans are required as part of the application materials, and construction easement language can include bonds or other financial assurances where appropriate.
Commissioner Nicole Flanges moved to approve the revised Parkland Easement Policy with two caveats: (1) restore the compensation and mitigation language from the 2012 policy and (2) allow staff to include a $200 minimum annual rent in the final draft. Commissioner Sean Hill seconded. There was no public comment and the motion carried on a voice vote.
Next steps: the commission’s action forwards the revised policy and the commission’s recommendation; the item will be handled per county procedure and, where required, proceed to the Board of County Commissioners for final action or adoption of implementing agreements.

