Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homestead Exemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resolution urging state to raise homestead exemption fails after council debate
Summary
Councilman Brazel’s resolution urging the South Carolina General Assembly to increase the homestead exemption failed (3–4) after members disagreed over process, fiscal impacts and whether county should pursue the change via the Association of Counties or the legislative delegation.
Get email alerts on the Homestead Exemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilman Brazel moved a resolution asking the South Carolina General Assembly to increase the statutory homestead exemption to provide greater tax relief for seniors, veterans and the legally blind. Brazel framed the resolution as overdue and noted historical increases between 1972 and 2000 that brought the statute from $5,000 to $50,000; he said reassessments have increased property values and seniors need relief.
Several council members raised procedural concerns and fiscal implications. Councilman Tucker urged working through the Association of Counties and established committee processes rather than unilateral local resolutions; other members warned that changing state law could shift funding burdens or trigger unintended consequences for local government and small businesses. Council members discussed whether county action would help influence the General Assembly and whether any change might require state compensation for local education or public-safety funding. Councilman Jones argued a simple resolution is a useful statement of support; others said a more formal process with financial estimates would be preferable.
By roll call the resolution failed (three in favor — Bridal, Thomason, Jones — and four opposed — Shoemake, Tucker, Connell, Cato). Councilmembers asked staff to clarify legal limits on local authority to change exemptions and to follow delegation channels if further action is pursued.

