Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Moderate"}] Out Of Context: [] Quantitative Precision: [{"type":"imprecise Amounts","description":"Board Packet Items List $67,200 For Paving; Superintendent Provided Additional State Funding Estimates But Transcript Formatting Makes The Exact Figures Unclear. The Article Should Present Packet Amounts As Specified And Treat Superintendent Estimates As Approximate And Quote Them Directly.","severity":"moderate"}] Process Clarity: [{"type":"personnel Name Conflict","description":"Resignation And Hiring Segments Contain Conflicting Or Inconsistent Name Spellings; The Article Must Indicate The Inconsistency Or Omit Uncertain Names And Use 'not Specified' Rather Than Asserting A Single Spelling.","severity":"high"}] Context Clarity: [] Question Emphasis: [] Omission: [] Bias: [] Duplicate: [] Attribution Lock: [{"type":"missing Verification","description":"Several Roll Call Votes Include Names That Differ From Earlier Mentions (e.g., 'Matt Bryce' Vs 'Matt Perez'); Verify Official Minutes Or Clerk's Record Before Final Publication Or Flag As Appearing That Way In The Transcript.","severity":"high"}] topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit of draft article and meeting processing
Summary
Automated audit of draft content against transcript and style/accuracy rules.
spelling: [] clarity: [] chronology: [] framing: [] misinformation: [{"type":"name_inconsistency","description":"Transcript contains multiple inconsistent spellings for some personal names (e.g., 'Jesse Rose' vs 'Jesse Roe'; 'Matt Bryce' vs 'Matt Perez' in roll-call lines). The draft initially used specific names without noting inconsistencies.","severity":"moderate"},{"type":"numeric_formatting","description":"Superintendent's estimated dollar figures in the transcript are unevenly formatted and the draft presented them without flagging formatting inconsistencies.","severity":"low"}] misidentification: [{"type":"speaker_mapping_uncertain","description":"Not all speaker-number-to-name mappings in the transcript are unambiguous; early roll-call segments interleave the roll-call reader and respondent labels, creating uncertainty about which transcript voice maps to which board member name. The draft avoided asserting uncertain mappings but recorded roll-call names as they appear.
