Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident calls for decentralized streaming pilot; another resident accuses agencies of retaliatory conduct

Kent County Board of Commissioners ยท May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two public commenters addressed the board: Dee Jones urged the county to explore decentralized streaming and crypto-based revenue for housing and 3D-printed construction pilots; Brandy Ritzma, a Kent County resident, asked the board to investigate alleged false reporting and coordinated retaliatory narratives by law enforcement affecting her family.

During the public-comment portion, two residents raised different issues with the board.

Dee Jones identified herself as an entrepreneur advocating for 3D-printed construction and decentralized streaming platforms that use "stream-to-earn" tokens. Jones urged the board to consider streaming county content on decentralized platforms as a potential non-tax revenue source to support affordable housing and workforce programs and offered to provide a white paper and additional information to staff.

Later in general public comment, Brandy Ritzma, who identified herself as a Kent County resident and a mother, told commissioners she has repeatedly sought oversight for nearly two years related to actions she said harmed her family. Ritzma said Kentwood police executed a search warrant at her child's high school and seized phones during the school day. She said internal police communications instructed officers to respond with two officers and a supervisor when possible because she speaks during commission meetings. Ritzma alleged those narratives have spread to the Kent County Sheriff's Office and that unverified claims have been repeated between agencies; she asked what oversight the board exercises when agencies reinforce unverified narratives about a citizen.

The board did not take immediate action on Ritzma's allegations during the meeting; no staff response or investigation timeline was announced on the record. The chair moved on to the next agenda item after the public comments concluded.