Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Astra planning panel debates tightening short-term rental rules, fines
Summary
The Astra Planning and Zoning Commission discussed revising short-term rental rules to improve enforceability, weighing modified permits and citation fines vs. rescinding local rules; commissioners favored a hybrid of clearer application requirements and fines, and asked staff to refine draft language.
The Astra Planning and Zoning Commission spent the bulk of its June 9 meeting debating how to address enforcement gaps in the town’s short-term rental rules.
Chair Jeff presented proposed revisions to Section 317(d), saying the current code fails to define “primary place of residence” and creates enforcement problems. "When we try and do something like that, we are really zoning regulating the use and not the user," he said, describing advice from the town attorney that limits what the commission can require about owner residency.
Jeff outlined three options: modify the existing regulations to allow more frequent rentals and remove the owner-occupancy standard; ask the Board of Selectmen to adopt a citation/fine ordinance as an enforcement tool; or rescind local short-term rental rules and rely on lake associations or await state guidance. He cautioned that rescinding could lead to effective grandfathering for operators who began renting before new rules are adopted.
Commissioner Mark Schnabel said rescinding would likely grandfather existing operators and expressed a preference for strengthening enforcement rather than repealing rules. Janet, a commissioner, said the owner-occupancy requirement appears legally unviable and backed adopting fines: "I think adopting some fine ordinances might be a good idea," she said.
The commission discussed administrative changes the chair proposed to the short-term rental application: clearer application requirements for owner-operators in RA zones, a guest register, and a placeholder surety bond or escrow that could be refunded after a successful renewal. Jeff described the fee figures shown as placeholders and said staff will confer with legal and finance staff before finalizing amounts.
Members also explored requiring a lake association or homeowners association sign-off for properties within association districts so that access to shared amenities (beaches, boat launches) could be conditioned on compliance. Commissioners repeatedly noted enforcement challenges for a small CEO office and the need for easily verifiable documentation of complaints; Janet suggested a guest register as an enforcement aid.
The commission did not adopt a final regulation at the June meeting but signaled support for a hybrid approach: revise the application/process to be more enforceable while pursuing an ordinance that would allow citation fines. Staff will circulate a revised draft for counsel review and share it with Lake Association representatives ahead of the next meeting.
The commission tabled a related application checklist to the next meeting because a current copy was not available.
