Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Newport News council adds emergency‑expense definition, approves two financing ordinances
Summary
The council voted 6–0 on May 26 to amend and adopt two ordinances authorizing water‑system and general‑improvement financing, inserting a definition of "emergency expenses" proposed by Councilman Long after a brief discussion.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Newport News City Council on May 26 amended and then adopted two separate financing ordinances — one authorizing water revenue notes and a revolving line of credit for water‑system projects and the other authorizing general‑obligation improvement notes for capital projects — adding a definition of "emergency expenses" and approving both measures by unanimous vote.
Councilman John Long moved to amend the ordinance language to include a definition of emergency expenses. Reading the proposed definition aloud, Long said, "emergency expenses means expenses arising out of any occurrence or threat thereof, which result or may result in substantial injury or harm to the population or substantial damage to or loss of property and natural resources, and that may require governmental actions beyond that otherwise authorized because the [event] caused immediate and irreparable harm consistent with section 404 tag 146.16 of the Code of Virginia." The motion was seconded by Councilman Coleman and the amended E1 ordinance (water revenue notes) passed 6–0. The same amendment was offered and approved for Item E2 (general‑improvement notes) and that vote also passed 6–0 after a technical redo of the roll call.
Why it matters: the two ordinances create borrowing tools the city can use to fund water and capital projects. Councilman Long said the added language clarifies when the line of credit could be used for emergency response; the transcript records the statute citation only as read aloud during the motion and the council did not provide a staff legal memo in the public record during the meeting.
What the vote did not decide: the council did not appropriate the full project budgets during the session; it authorized notes and a line of credit mechanism. No public comment was recorded on these two ordinances during the hearings.
Council process and next steps: both amended ordinances were adopted on the night’s vote. The ordinance texts and the legal citation as read during the motion are recorded in the meeting record; the council did not, during this meeting, provide further legal verification of the statute language beyond what council members read aloud.

