Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Assessment Tools topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District explains move from NWEA to IXL; board questions privacy, screen time and evidence

Academy District 20 Board of Education · April 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff outlined a planned switch from NWEA/MAP Growth to IXL for benchmarking, describing training plans and vendor support; staff said students who used IXL showed higher growth in district analysis, while board members pressed on privacy, assessment continuity and whether learning outcomes are improved.

District leaders told the board they plan to adopt IXL as the district’s primary benchmarking tool in place of NWEA/MAP Growth.

Staff emphasized that implementation will include training for school assessment coordinators and teachers, that scoring and presentation differ between platforms, and that IXL provides ongoing intervention data. Presenters said professional learning was scheduled in June–August to support the transition.

“This isn’t a brand new implementation for us… we are just going to start using it as our benchmarking tool,” a district presenter said, noting training and district‑level experience with IXL.

Staff cited a district analysis showing students who used IXL improved at a higher rate. “Of our District 20 students who used the IXL tool, we saw those students improve more at a rate of 10.8 percentile points than we did our other students,” one staff member said.

Board members asked several follow‑up questions: how IXL handles student data and third‑party vendors, how a transition may affect growth and achievement comparisons, how screen time would be limited in classrooms, and whether there is strong external evidence that the platform improves mental‑health or long‑term academic outcomes. Staff said vendor contracts and data/privacy questions were evaluated through the district’s RFP/contracting process and that IXL’s reports will be integrated with teacher‑led interventions.

Why it matters: Assessment change affects how teachers and families read growth and proficiency measures; it also affects benchmarking and accountability reporting.

What’s next: District staff said they will hold professional learning in summer institute sessions and provide updated dashboards to the board once state results are available.