Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clear Creek commissioners weigh lodging-tax priorities as receipts show volatility and childcare ask exceeds available funds

Board of County Commissioners of Clear Creek County · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Officials reviewed 2024–26 lodging-tax receipts and a 40/30/30 split (tourism/housing/childcare). Commissioners debated drawing on fund balance, tightening childcare- scholarship eligibility (noting Georgetown's outsized scholarship use vs contributions), and whether tourism should remain at a 40% "minimum viable" allocation.

County staff presented lodging-tax actuals and a projected 2026 budget assuming $310,000 in receipts and a traditional 40%/30%/30% split among tourism, the housing authority and childcare scholarships. Staff warned that a recent surge in receipts makes the forecast uncertain and that the childcare partner requested $131,000 — about $43,000 above the board's current plan — which would require drawing more heavily on the lodging-tax fund balance.

Commissioners discussed options: reduce county contributions to childcare scholarships; maintain the tourism bureau allocation at 40% to preserve a "minimum viable" marketing capacity; or revise scholarship eligibility so households in Georgetown (which contributes little into the county lodging pool) are ineligible or share in funding. One commissioner noted that roughly 27% of scholarship recipients listed a Georgetown ZIP code and recommended asking the scholarship administrator for city-level residency data rather than ZIP codes to better match funding to where lodging taxes are collected.

Staff recommended waiting for end-of-quarter receipts before making a final allocation change; several commissioners asked the county manager to present a concise business case at an upcoming mayors-and-commissioners meeting, explain the fairness concern and request greater partner participation in funding. The board agreed to revisit allocations after first-quarter receipts are final and to ask the scholarship administrator for detailed residency and employment location data to inform eligibility criteria.