Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent agenda and moves on referendum bids; air‑conditioning pre‑purchase explained
Summary
The board approved the consent agenda, considered pulled referendum items and contractors, and heard staff explain a pre‑purchase of air‑conditioning equipment and soft‑cost allowances; staff said the referendum projects are currently about $2 million under top-line budget estimates but soft costs will be refined.
The Oshkosh Area School District board approved its consent agenda Feb. 25, then took up several pulled referendum items and bid recommendations from facilities and finance.
Facilities staff summarized project status from the 2024 referendum: the district has bid multiple packages (window replacements, building additions, gym floor replacement and asbestos abatement) and recommended lowest bidders for several items; staff noted that some work will be funded from the referendum (Fund 49) while other costs will come from general or other district funds.
Staff explained the district used a pre‑purchase approach for long‑lead air‑conditioning equipment for three elementary schools (Lakeside, Reed and Emeline Cook) and reported the equipment pre‑purchase amount at $339,319. Facilities staff described projected soft costs — engineering, architectural fees, playground, furnishings and allowances — and noted an initial soft‑cost line of $1,057,000 for those sites that will be refined as work proceeds. The project manager said current sums show the referendum program roughly $2,000,000 under the April 2025 top‑line budget of about $74,000,000, with approximately $122,000,000 in remaining projects still to be scheduled.
Trustees debated procurement procedures, including a concern raised about single bids for some items; after discussion the board approved the recommended contractors and in at least one case voted to table an item to clarify bidding procedures. The board recorded votes to carry the consent agenda and to approve the pulled general‑contractor motions; a motion to table a specified item also carried.
Facilities staff said more granular breakdowns of soft costs and allowances will be provided as projects move from design into construction and that material changes requiring additional board approval would be returned to facilities and finance and to the full board as needed.
