Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Benton board adopts opt‑in gender‑identity handout after hours of public comment
Summary
After extended public comment, the Fort Benton School Board voted to adopt the MTSBA recommended policy (Option 1) with added language requiring any gender‑identity materials be a board‑preapproved, opt‑in handout and parental notice before instruction.
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fort Benton School Board on Thursday approved a revision to its health‑instruction policy, adopting the Montana School Boards Association’s Option 1 but adding language that limits any gender‑identity material to a board‑preapproved, opt‑in handout available only to students whose parents give written permission. The motion passed by voice vote after more than an hour of public comment.
The vote follows a second reading by the board’s policy committee and lengthy discussion about how to balance student access to information, parental rights and community concerns. The committee’s motion, offered by a board member (Speaker 7), described the change as a compromise that would make definitions and trusted resources available while requiring parents to opt in.
Supporters said the handout is a limited glossary and a way to connect students who are struggling with trusted resources. “This is an outstanding compromise,” said Mike McDowell, a former educator and school‑board member (Speaker 16), who urged the board to adopt the measure as written. Administrators emphasized that the material is voluntary, will be preapproved by the board, and that parents will receive notice and access to the instructional materials before any classroom lesson.
Opponents urged caution and asked that materials be tightly controlled or kept out of general classrooms. Gail Allen (Speaker 2), a longtime community member, argued the district should not expose minors to gender‑identity material and asked the board to ensure parents can review curriculum in advance.
District staff and board members repeatedly said the proposed handout is a short glossary with definitions and a list of trusted local resources, not a scripted lesson. The administration also noted that state guidance and legal counsel flagged that if a handout is made available in classrooms, the district must select the policy option that permits identity instruction; the board’s added language narrowly defines that instruction as a preapproved handout requiring parental consent.
The board will publish the preapproved handout and the notice sent to families as part of the process for the opt‑in permission. The motion passed by voice vote; the chair announced the motion carried. The district said parents will get access to the materials electronically at least five days before any instruction as required by state statute references discussed during the meeting.
Next steps include finalizing the exact wording of the board‑approved handout and the parent notice, and placing procedures in the district handbook to govern availability and parental permission.

