Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Unified Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
JPAAC meeting highlights Utah's unified transportation plan as a model for statewide collaboration
Summary
At the Joint Policy Advisory Committee meeting, UDOT and MPO leaders presented Utah's Unified Transportation Plan (2027'2055), emphasizing shared financial modeling, an interactive statewide map, standardized definitions and cross-agency coordination as keys to implementation.
Ted Knowlton, deputy director of the Wasatch Front Regional Council, opened the Joint Policy Advisory Committee meeting and framed the group's role in coordinating multi-agency transportation planning across Utah.
Andrea Olsen, planning director at the Utah Department of Transportation, described Utah's Unified Transportation Plan as an aggregate of MPO and agency long-range plans covering highways, transit, active transportation and corridor preservation for the 2027'2055 horizon. "It's more than a list of projects," Olsen said. "It's the way that we collaborate, share a financial model and standardize our GIS and definitions so we can sing with one voice." She noted the plan uses a shared financial model to estimate funding and to coordinate investment priorities statewide.
Denise Davenport, MPO director with the Mountain Land Association of Governments, demonstrated the plan's website and interactive map at unifiedplan.org, showing users how to filter projects by MPO region, mode and project phase. Davenport said the governance structure includes a policy committee supported by eight subcommittees (finance, GIS/mapping, communications, and more) that refine definitions and align priorities across MPOs and agencies.
Committee members said the unified plan's strengths include its multimodal scope and the cross-jurisdictional coordination that helps make projects fundable at the statewide level. Several members urged adding an economic-analysis component to quantify the opportunity cost of delaying projects and to strengthen the case for implementation and advocacy. "There's value in showing the cost of avoidance," said Carlton Christensen, who recommended embedding more economic outputs to inform policymaker decisions.
The meeting closed the discussion with an invitation for members to suggest themes for the committee this year, with follow-up opportunities to review how the unified plan relates to local plans and priorities.
The committee adjourned after the federal and state updates; the next JPAAC meeting is scheduled for June 4.
