Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riverdale council updates PRUD rules to give council earlier oversight and stronger standards
Summary
Council adopted an amended planned-residential overlay (PD) that replaces the prior PRUD approach, adding earlier Development Review Committee input with council representation, requiring most PD amendments to return to the council and directing staff to draft stronger fence and maintenance standards in the comprehensive code update.
Riverdale’s City Council approved a rewrite of the city’s planned-residential unit development (PRUD) provisions in favor of a PD overlay approach designed to give the council earlier and more effective influence on major developments.
Brandon Cooper, the community-development director, summarized the changes: the proposed PD overlay is an optional, legislative overlay that can be applied to specific properties and it modifies the review process so that a Development Review Committee (DRC) — expanded to include staff from public works, police, fire, a planning-commission representative, the mayor and one council member — will provide early feedback on concept plans before formal application. The PD overlay also preserves council legislative authority for map amendments, general-plan amendments and major subdivisions for commercial and mixed use.
Several councilors pressed for stronger, enforceable standards rather than discretionary suggestions. Councilor Alan Arnold sought mandatory decorative or functional fencing along public streets and a maintenance strip under fences to prevent vegetation encroachment; staff committed to drafting a new city-wide fence standard in the comprehensive update and to using the PD overlay to negotiate specific, enforceable requirements into development agreements.
The council voted to adopt Ordinance 999 amending Title 10, Chapter 22 (PRUD) into the PD overlay framework. Staff noted the change removes the minor/major amendment distinctions and returns amendments to the council by default to ensure elected oversight rather than administrative adjustments.
The change is intended to reduce the number of unexpected field changes after approvals by (1) bringing council and the DRC into early design conversations and (2) enabling negotiated development agreements with explicit, enforceable obligations where the city’s base code lacks sufficient standards.
