Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Forest Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Willington commission debates forest-resiliency grant, trail reroutes and habitat trade-offs
Summary
Commissioners discussed a DEEP municipal forest-resiliency grant that could fund invasive removal but requires associated forest practices, and pushed back on a CFPA proposal to reroute the Nipmuck Trail through core town forest over concerns about fragmenting habitat and increasing edge effects.
In a lengthy discussion May 20 the Willington Conservation Commission weighed whether to pursue a state forest-resiliency grant and debated a proposed trail reroute that would cross town-owned Talmage property.
Commissioners noted the grant from Connecticut DEEP could help pay for invasive-species removal but often requires an associated forest practice such as thinning or creating a wildlife opening. Several members, including forest practitioners and volunteers, warned that introducing harvest machinery and creating skid roads can increase the spread of invasives and that small openings (for example a half-acre) may not produce the intended habitat benefits without larger-scale planning and ongoing resources for invasive control.
"Sometimes the best thing to do in a core forest is nothing," said Dan Dunahue, who urged caution about creating openings in intact interior forest. Other members noted the town's acquisition purpose for these parcels is passive recreation and wildlife habitat, and questioned whether the town has capacity to carry long-term management for a thinning project.
Commissioners also reviewed a proposal from the Connecticut Forest and Park Association to reroute the Nipmuck Trail where beaver dams now obstruct passage. CFPA offered to flag and steward the reroute, but commissioners said the proposed alignment would create a new trail that fragments a core forest area and requested CFPA explain why an existing town trail was not used instead.
The meeting did not result in final commitments to pursue a DEEP grant; members agreed to wait for the grant notice (RFP) and to gather more data on likely scope and costs before deciding whether to undertake forest practice work or simply seek funding strictly for invasive removal.
What to watch - Commission follow-up to CFPA: ask CFPA to provide rationale for the new reroute and to consider alternatives that use established trails to minimize fragmentation. - When the DEEP municipal grant RFP is released (anticipated in June), the commission will review eligibility, allowable activities and potential match or implementation costs before deciding whether to apply.
