Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council presses administration on Karma host agreement, cannabis revenue allocation and Newman Leather status
Summary
Council members asked for the host‑agreement details for Karma and sought clarity on where cannabis‑related community benefit revenues are allocated; council also requested follow‑up after reporting that Newman Leather’s rehabilitation‑area status had been revoked following litigation and a recent ownership change.
Council discussion on March 2 focused on a pending host agreement for Karma and broader questions about where cannabis revenue and community impact fees are being allocated. Director Brown told the caucus the Planning Board approved the Karma application and that the host agreement (memo in the packet) includes a 1% community impact fee on gross annual sales or $50,000, local hiring commitments, a public‑safety coordination requirement with the police department, an annual community engagement meeting, and automatic one‑year renewals if the business continues operating in the city.
Council members pressed administration staff to explain where prior host‑agreement funds were directed, noting past discussions that described allocations to organizations such as the Boys & Girls Club but no final codified destinations. Councilman Russo and others said the council should see whether the funds are being placed in the general fund or earmarked with offsetting expenses; staff said some allocation language was discussed at a high level in prior review‑board conversations but not formalized and that final negotiation of host agreements falls to the mayor’s office.
The caucus also raised an unrelated but connected community‑development item: recent reporting that Newman Leather’s rehabilitation‑area status had been denied in higher‑level litigation and that ownership of the property had changed. Staff agreed to locate and circulate the article and follow up at the next meeting with any implications for redevelopment plans.
Council asked administration to review last year’s budget line items for cannabis revenue, identify whether dedicated budget lines or offsets exist, and provide clarity on how 75% social equity language in the ordinance is being implemented. No formal decisions were made during the caucus; staff committed to provide memos and documentation on host‑agreement terms, recent media on Newman Leather, and budget routing for cannabis revenues.
