Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Visual Arts Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RSU 26 adopts K–12 visual arts curriculum after debate over early-grade expression
Summary
The board approved a new K–12 visual-arts curriculum 5–0. Board members asked staff to revisit K–5 language to better emphasize creative expression in early grades and agreed staff should consult art teachers before any revisions.
Get email alerts on the Visual Arts Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The RSU 26 school board voted to adopt the district's new K–12 visual-arts curriculum after a lengthy discussion about how the documents describe creative expression in early grades.
“Susan presented the process and product highlights, noting a year‑and‑a‑half collaborative development with art teachers,” the board recorded. Susan described using a Google notebook AI tool to generate infographics and said the curriculum maps include I‑can statements, assessment guidance and cultural‑inclusiveness language.
Board member Noah pressed for stronger language in the K–5 documents to protect and foreground young students’ expressive work. “One more I‑can on each other — one more like little point — it’s not a major revision, but it signals that at the earliest grades we must foster free expression,” Noah said, urging staff to work with teachers to reflect that emphasis in the text.
Board members stressed they were not seeking to rewrite classroom practice but wanted the written curriculum to reflect existing practice and values. The board discussed procedural options: approve now and ask staff and the art faculty to consider Noah’s suggested wording for potential return in the fall, or postpone final adoption. The board voted to adopt the curriculum as presented and asked staff to review the K–5 language with art teachers for possible, modest edits.
Vote: motion to adopt the K–12 visual arts curriculum carried 5–0.
Next steps: staff will consult the art team and bring suggested language back if adjustments are proposed; the curriculum will be revisited on the normal review cycle if no immediate edits are recommended.

