Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Tif topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge transparency on TIF, raise eminent‑domain concerns; counsel clarifies statutory process
Summary
Public commenters urged delay and more public education about a proposed Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district and associated redevelopment, warning of pressure on small businesses and possible eminent domain use; village counsel said any use of eminent domain must follow the Illinois Eminent Domain Act.
During public comment the board heard multiple statements urging more public engagement and transparency about the proposed TIF district and related redevelopment activity along the Hap Road corridor. Beverly Smith asked whether the board would make decisions before candidate interviews and raised questions about eminent domain in a TIF, and resident Jen Hall warned that small business owners are fearful of land‑acquisition pressure tied to redevelopment proposals.
Jen Hall specifically urged residents to watch the village plan‑and‑zoning commission’s May 20 meeting for fuller context and referenced the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Kelo v. City of New London when discussing eminent‑domain concerns. "These are important discussions," Hall said, asking trustees to center residents in decision‑making.
Corporation counsel responded during public comment that the power of eminent domain exists both inside and outside a TIF district and that any governmental use of eminent domain must comply with the Eminent Domain Act, including good‑faith offers and negotiations with property owners. Counsel rejected the idea that simply being in a TIF grants an authority to take property without the statutory process.
