Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisor raises allegation that a 14-year-old placed in a CPS-approved hotel was trafficked
Summary
At a board meeting, a supervisor reported a 14-year-old who had been placed in a hotel with an unvetted third-party caregiver escaped and was subsequently trafficked; the board asked legal staff to inquire about the child's current status and care while noting confidentiality limits with CPS.
A member of the Harrison County Board of Supervisors reported to colleagues that a blue ribbon committee had been told a 14-year-old who had been placed in a hotel with a nonvetted third-party caregiver while involved with Child Protective Services later escaped and was trafficked for sex, according to the supervisor's account.
The supervisor said the girl was taken by men who paid for sex and was moved through Harrison County and into New Orleans. The supervisor characterized the sequence as: "She was trafficked for sex ... sold her to other men all the way to New Orleans." (Supervisor (unnamed))
Board members and staff expressed concern and debated what information the county could obtain from CPS given confidentiality rules. One board member asked the county attorney to reach out to CPS leadership (named in the transcript as Andrea Sanders) to ask whether the child was receiving care and whether the county could learn the child's current placement without violating confidentiality. The board sought confirmation that the child was receiving psychiatric and medical care, and a staff member told supervisors the child was receiving psychiatric care and health testing.
Why it matters: The allegation, if accurate, raises urgent child-welfare and public-safety concerns about how vulnerable children are placed and supervised when CPS uses third-party or hotel placements. County supervisors signaled they wanted more information while acknowledging CPS confidentiality limits.
Cautions: The claim reported to the board was made in committee and described in general terms at the meeting; board members did not adjudicate the factual accuracy of the trafficking allegation at the meeting. Several supervisors emphasized they lacked the child's identity and that CPS confidentiality constrains what the county may be told publicly.
Next steps: The board asked counsel to contact CPS to inquire (without seeking or publishing protected identifying information) about the child's current status and care; the board did not take formal enforcement action at the meeting and did not open litigation related to the allegation on the record.
