Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Contract topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Superior Police Local 27 contract, side letter and staffing recommendations

Superior Common Council · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved the Superior Police Local 27 collective bargaining renewal (noted as a 4% increase July 1 and 4% the following year), approved an officer-in-charge side letter, and authorized several job postings recommended by the Human Resources Committee.

The Superior Common Council on March 24 approved a new collective bargaining agreement with Superior Police Local 27 and adopted related personnel recommendations.

During a Human Resources Committee report, the committee chair summarized a March 16 meeting and recommended approval of the police contract renewal and several staffing actions. "A quick synopsis: it was a 4% July 1st and a 4% [increase] next year," the chair said, describing additional side letters as largely administrative.

On the council floor, Councilor Johnson moved to approve the Superior Police Local Number 27 2026–2027 contract renewal; Councilor Finnessy seconded the motion, and the voice vote carried. Councilor Finnessy then moved to approve changes to the officer-in-charge program side letter agreement, seconded by Councilor Herrick; that motion also carried.

The committee report also listed recommended hires and job postings, including a building inspector, a light equipment operator and a firefighter. The chair said the committee will return in April with discussion about using a consumer price index as a method to set non-union wage increases.

Why it matters: The contract sets wage increases for represented officers and the approved side letter clarifies officer-in-charge responsibilities; the council also advanced staffing matters the city says are needed to maintain services.

There was no roll-call vote or tally published in the meeting transcript; both contract motions carried on voice votes. The council did not provide detailed budgetary breakdowns for the contract increases at this meeting.

Sources: Human Resources Committee chair; Councilor Johnson; Councilor Finnessy; council proceedings, March 24, 2026.