Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jenks authority awards $257,721 contract for citywide water distribution master plan
Summary
The Jenks Public Works Authority voted March 17, 2026, to award Cowan Group Engineering LLC a $257,721 contract to create a citywide water distribution master plan, funded from the FY2025–26 budget (account 565-315-392). The study will map pipes, calibrate pressures and produce a 20-year capital improvement list.
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Jenks Public Works Authority voted on March 17, 2026, to award a $257,721 contract to Cowan Group Engineering LLC to develop a citywide water distribution master plan, funded from the fiscal year 2025–26 budget (account 565-315-392).
The study will map the system, document pipe materials and sizes, calibrate flow and pressure under peak loads, and produce a prioritized capital improvement plan, city staff and the presenter told trustees. “The overall goal is that city of Jenks has an infrastructure that may be a little bit aging,” said Mr. Wilkins, the presenter. He said the model will allow staff to “pinpoint those areas that need more fire flow, pressure, just control,” and to prioritize short- and long-term projects.
Mr. Wilkins told the board three firms submitted qualifications for the contract (Cowan Group Engineering, Garver, and Freese and Nichols) and that Cowan was recommended based on qualifications and prior work with the city. Mr. Carr, speaking later in the discussion, compared the work to a wastewater master plan done under 10 years ago and said the water study is intended to produce a capital improvement list tied to land use and zoning projections.
Trustees asked for clarification that the contract is for study and planning only; the presenter confirmed it is not a design-build contract and that it should yield a capital list of projects to coordinate with ongoing projects such as the Elm Street work. The presenter described the effort as a roughly 20-year planning horizon that will help the city budget and sequence improvements.
A motion to award the contract “as presented” was moved and seconded (mover and seconder are not specified in the transcript). The recorded votes in the meeting record were: Short — Yes; Emmons — Yes; Murray — Yes; Chair Corey Box — Yes. The motion carried.
The authority adjourned at approximately 6:15 p.m.
The vote and motion details are recorded in the meeting transcript; the transcript does not identify the members who made and seconded the motion.

