Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor And Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
RSU 67 board authorizes contract scheduling changes and hears proposal to host behavioral program locally
Summary
The board authorized the superintendent to amend Schedule B of the RSU 67 Education Association contract and to create a memorandum of understanding for 2026–27, noted bus‑driver negotiations and discussed a proposed locally hosted behavioral program estimated to cost about $500,000 to serve 6–8 students.
The RSU 67 school board authorized the superintendent to amend Schedule B of the RSU 67 Education Association contract and to develop a memorandum of understanding to take effect in the 2026–27 school year.
Board members said the authorization follows negotiations work and will formalize recommended schedule‑B changes produced by a committee that included the superintendent, negotiators and education association representatives. The board approved the authorization by voice vote; a detailed tally was not recorded in the transcript.
Administrators also reported that bus drivers submitted a 10‑day notice to begin negotiations; the board said an initial negotiations meeting had occurred.
Separately, the superintendent and administrators outlined a proposal to create a district‑run, project‑based program for students with behavioral needs. The superintendent said the district hopes to bring 6–8 students back from out‑of‑district placements into a locally hosted facility and estimated implementation costs "around $500,000," noting potential savings from reduced long‑distance transportation and long‑term placement costs. Board members were supportive in concept and asked for a detailed project plan and staffing analysis to be shared at a future meeting.
What was not decided The board approved the authorization for Schedule B changes but did not vote on a final plan or a funding appropriation for the behavioral program during the meeting; implementation details (site selection, staffing and final budget) will be developed by administrators and returned to the board for further action.
