Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Space Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies street‑closure request for celebration of life; members pledge to seek alternatives
Summary
Council declined a request to close 12th Street for a two‑hour invite‑only memorial event after concerns about precedent and neighborhood impact; presenters said they would work with the applicant to find possible alternative dates or locations and suggested exploring cemetery property.
The council considered a request from Shakenya Wright to close 12th Street between 29th and 31st Avenues for a private celebration of life. The applicant said the event was invite‑only and organizers would provide cleanup and requested an additional hour for setup. Presentation materials included a petition in which neighbors on the block largely supported the event after being informed of its purpose; however, three objections appeared on the application packet (two of those later signed the petition supporting the event, per the applicant).
Council discussion focused on precedent and the future implications of regularly approving street closures adjacent to a cemetery, and on potential impacts to residents who may not live in the immediate block. The ward representative said she supported the event in principle but raised caution about setting a precedent for similar requests. After discussion, the motion to close the street failed to receive the required majority.
A woman who spoke during public comment provided an emotional account of losing her child to asthma and urged the council to allow the closure to prevent future harm; councilors expressed sympathy and said staff would follow up to explore alternatives, such as holding activities on cemetery property or identifying a different nearby location and coordinating with the applicant offline.
Why it matters: Street closures for memorial events raise questions about neighborhood consent, public safety, precedent for future requests and the appropriate public venue for private memorials adjacent to public spaces. The council’s decision to deny the specific request reflects concern about neighborhood impacts and precedent; councilors signaled willingness to work with the family to find an alternative.
What’s next: Staff and the applicant will confer about alternative locations and logistical options; the council signaled it would help explore solutions but did not reverse the vote at the meeting.
