Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Discipline Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State board weighs ADA disciplinary study and an ethics assessment tool to reduce repeat violations
Summary
Board members reviewed an ADA study finding recordkeeping, treatment and professionalism complaints are most common and discussed using targeted remediation and proactive data to prevent future violations. A presentation on Eboss, a scenario-based ethics assessment, prompted questions about use for repeat offenders and ISC cases.
The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners disciplinary review committee discussed an American Dental Association March 2025 report that analyzed disciplinary records from 2000–2016 and found recordkeeping, inaccurate treatment and professionalism complaints among general dentists were the most frequent issues. Miss Nichols introduced the item and Dr. Robert McNeel urged the committee to shift toward earlier, data-driven interventions that could prevent harm rather than only acting retroactively.
Bradley Guy of Ethics Boundaries Assessment Services (Eboss) gave a detailed presentation about his company’s scenario‑based ethics assessment, which is administered at Prometric testing centers and is used by several regulatory boards as part of remediation. Guy said boards typically receive a detailed report of strengths, blind spots and suggested remediation after the licensee completes a scenario tailored to the underlying violation. He noted there is usually no cost to the board; respondents pay per‑scenario fees.
Board members asked about evidence of effectiveness and whether the tool reduced recidivism. Guy cited client data showing reduced repeat violator cases where the tool was used consistently and said psychometric analysis is forthcoming. Members pressed on operational limits: whether Eboss could be ordered at ISC when allegations focus on different violations and how to frame remediation so it would be legally defensible. Staff and members cautioned about trying to retrofit an ethics assessment into an allegation set that does not match the underlying concerns.
The committee did not adopt a formal rule or policy at the meeting but directed staff to keep Eboss materials available for panels that consider remediation language in orders. The discussion underscored a broader interest in using targeted education, better data collection and modern outreach to reduce future disciplinary cases.
