Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hickman County adopts cooling-off period for rezoning applications after residents complain of repeated resubmittals
Summary
Commissioners approved Resolution 2614, as amended, creating a six-month waiting period after a denial and a three-month period after withdrawal; proponents said the change protects neighbors from repeated, nearly identical rezoning petitions and reduces wasted public hearing attendance.
HICKMAN COUNTY, Tenn. — The Hickman County legislative body on May 26 adopted Resolution 2614 to establish a cooling-off period for rezoning applications, after commissioners amended the proposed rules to shorten waiting times.
Sponsor Commissioner Calakott explained the change is intended to curb repeated resubmissions of rezoning requests that draw neighbors to multiple public hearings without any substantive change to applications. "It establishes a cooling off period after a zoning has been denied," Calakott said, noting the measure came from concerns raised by planning staff and residents who said applicants repeatedly refiled previously denied requests.
The original resolution set a 12-month waiting period on items denied by the commission and six months for items that were withdrawn. Commissioner Barnhill offered an amendment lowering the first period to six months and the withdrawal period to three months; the commission approved the amendment and then passed the amended Resolution 2614 by roll call, 11 yes, one no, two absent.
Supporters said the policy would reduce the administrative burden on staff and the frustration felt by neighbors who come to hearings only to find an item removed from the agenda without notice. Opponents expressed concern about restricting property owners' ability to seek rezonings; the final text preserves the right to reapply after the waiting period and permits staff or the planning director to present an application when ownership or circumstances preclude applicant attendance.
The measure had been reviewed by the planning commission and received discussion at two public hearings before the county vote.
