Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs affordable‑housing incentive tied to deed restrictions; moves penalty language into broader code reference
Summary
Providence’s Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve PCC 10-8-10, an affordable-housing incentive that offers a 20% density bonus for qualifying developments contingent on deed restrictions and annual reporting; commissioners requested penalty language be moved and referenced to PCC 10-2-2.
The Providence Planning Commission on March 11 voted to recommend City Council adopt revisions to the city’s affordable‑housing incentives (referenced in the packet as PCC 10-8-10) that would offer developers a 20% density incentive in exchange for recorded deed restrictions and ongoing reporting.
Staff presenter Scarlett Bankhead described the proposal as a tool to preserve affordability for a period after initial sale. "Qualifying developments are eligible for a 20% density incentive," Bankhead said. "So, if you could have 10 units per acre and you qualified for this, then you could have 12 units per acre instead of 10 without having to go through a zone change or anything." The deed restrictions would specify owner‑occupancy or reduced resale terms and require annual reporting by property managers as a condition of the incentive.
Commissioners probed enforcement and penalty language. Commissioner Joel asked whether the penalty cited in the draft (line 76 of the staff packet) created a meaningful enforcement mechanism. Staff and others pointed to Providence City Code 10-2-2, which establishes class‑C penalties for Title 10 violations and allows escalation if violations continue. To make enforcement clearer, commissioners agreed to move the reporting/penalty clause into a separate item G and explicitly reference PCC 10-2-2 for fines and penalties; that change was added to the motion.
The commission also discussed practical limits: staff said audits would be annual and that administrative steps are required before escalating to citations; commissioners noted the free market and investor behavior can undermine affordability aims (investors buying units and renting them), and staff said deed restrictions are intended to preserve affordability for a stated period, not to guarantee permanent affordability.
Commissioner Michael Fortune moved that the planning commission make a favorable recommendation to City Council on the PCC 10-8-10 affordable‑housing incentives, including the agreed wording change (move line 76 to item G and reference PCC 10-2-2 for penalties); Joe Chambers seconded and the motion passed with all commissioners voting in favor. The recommendation—and the exact deed‑restriction language—will be forwarded to the City Council for final consideration.
