Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Golf Course topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables 15‑year golf course lease after questions about finances and capital needs
Summary
Councilors postponed action on a proposed 15‑year lease with the Moab Golf Club after lengthy discussion about the club’s recent finances, aging irrigation infrastructure, and proposed city‑backed capital assistance; council asked for a shorter term, clearer financials and oversight details before returning to the issue.
The Moab City Council on May 12 tabled consideration of a proposed 15‑year commercial lease with the Moab Golf Club after extended questioning about the club’s financial condition and the scope and timing of required infrastructure work.
Staff presented a draft lease that would lengthen the term from 10 to 15 years, refine the rent formula language, require expanded insurance and environmental protections, and create a conditional pathway for limited city‑backed capital assistance for qualifying projects. The lease clarified that the city owns the golf course land while the Moab Golf Club operates the facility.
Moab Golf Club representatives said the course’s irrigation system is decades old, described a difficult 2024 season when conditions declined, and explained current efforts to stabilize conditions and complete a master plan supported by a grant and consultant. “We need a plan,” said Richard, the club president, explaining that a master plan and an economic impact analysis will help identify priorities and potential revenue streams.
Councilors pressed the club for clearer financial statements and repayment plans for any city assistance. One councilor noted the club has not produced positive net profit consistently since 2021 and asked whether a long lease that contemplates city capital would be prudent. Multiple councilors said they want a shorter‑term agreement, board oversight, and separate agreements for any city capital contributions.
After discussion, Councilor Miles moved to table the lease and direct staff to return with additional analysis, including firmer financials from the club, alternatives to a 15‑year term, and a plan for oversight and repayment. The motion passed; no lease was approved. Council and staff agreed to continue dialog, conduct a site visit, and review the consultant master‑plan work when it is complete.
