Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meadow Wood Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ripon City council approves amendment allowing Lennar to pull permits for all 88 Meadow Wood homes
Summary
At a special meeting, Ripon City’s council approved Amendment No. 3 to the Meadow Wood subdivision agreement, removing a 21-permit cap and adding indemnification for public access to model homes; staff said risk is low and bonds remain in place.
Get email alerts on the Meadow Wood Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a special Ripon City meeting, the council approved Amendment No. 3 to the subdivision improvement agreement with Lennar Homes, allowing the developer to pull permits for all 88 homes in the Meadow Wood subdivision and adding an indemnification clause for public access to model homes.
Engineering staff member Spencer Schrone told the council that Amendment No. 3 removes the prior permit cap (established in Amendment No. 2 at 21 permits) and adds a provision requiring Lennar to indemnify and hold the city harmless for claims arising from public access to model homes before the city formally accepts subdivision improvements. Schrone said the improvements and punch list are nearly complete and that staff considers the additional risk to the city "very low." He also noted that completion and warranty bonds remain in place to secure work.
The change drew questions from council members about how the removal of the cap aligns with Ripon City’s growth ordinance. Schrone explained that the growth allocation mechanism currently allows roughly a 2.5% allocation through development agreements (up to 3% in a given year) and that, according to staff calculations presented at the meeting, the 2.5% allocation equates to roughly 150 permits. Staff said that allocations and development-agreement schedules are tools the city uses to balance permit issuance if multiple developers seek permits in a given timeframe.
Council members also pressed on the indemnity’s strength and whether the city could still be named in lawsuits if a member of the public is injured before improvements are accepted. Schrone said indemnity shifts the obligation to defend and to pay for claims to Lennar, but acknowledged the practical reality that the city could be named in a suit; the indemnity requires Lennar to step in to defend and release the city from liability.
A council member moved to approve Amendment No. 3; the motion was seconded. The council approved the amendment by voice vote (Mr. Zuber: Yes; Mr. Restuccia: Yes; Mr. Uecker: Aye). The transcript does not identify the mover or seconder by name.
Staff noted that Lennar intends to open model homes to the public and that models will be available May 2, per discussion during the meeting. The meeting record indicates that base pricing for models had been posted on the builder’s website as "starting about 650"; the transcript does not specify a currency or full figure for that entry.
Next steps: the amendment is adopted and the subdivision remains subject to the requirement that no homes may close and no property may transfer to buyers until the city formally accepts the public improvements.

