Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Assessment Change topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves professional‑development contract for new formative tool over parental concern

Lexington County School District Five Board of Trustees · April 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of discussion, trustees approved a contract for professional development tied to a recommended formative assessment (I‑Ready) 4–3. The vote followed extensive debate about screen time, parent outreach, data privacy and whether the board should approve a major PD contract before wider parent engagement.

Trustees voted to approve a professional‑development contract for a formative assessment tool after an often emotional public and board debate about screen time, implementation and parent outreach.

Administration presented I‑Ready as a recommended formative assessment and “thermostat” that not only measures students’ levels but also provides individualized learning pathways. Instructional staff and the superintendent cited early district results from Tier‑2 tutoring and pilots showing student growth. “This child is now in the green,” Superintendent Dr. Akquille Ross said, describing a case where sustained tutoring and personalized instruction moved a student from the 10th percentile into the 62nd.

Several trustees and many members of the public raised concerns: increased screen time, what the platform tells students and parents about incorrect answers, whether parents had been adequately informed, and data‑privacy compliance. Instructional leaders said the platform is on the state‑approved list, FERPA‑ and COPPA‑compliant, and that teacher training and parent communication would accompany any rollout. They added the district intends to consolidate existing digital programs to avoid increasing total in‑class screen time.

Despite the objections, the motion to approve the PD contract (exhibit D) carried 4–3. Board minutes show concerns will be memorialized and administration will continue parent outreach and provide further details on data handling and the scope of student use.

Administration said the contract covers professional development for staff to interpret formative diagnostic data and to tailor instruction; purchase of the full weekly curriculum components was presented as an administrative choice that could be phased in later.

The contract approval was one of several action items carried during the evening. Trustees emphasized they expect clear parent communications and teacher training before any large‑scale classroom rollout of week‑in/week‑out student digital practice.