Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Watershed groups urge transparent handling of Rockview’s 5,800 acres; Watershed Commission paused on signing letter
Summary
The Spring Creek Watershed Commission update described an environmental assessment and a Clearwater Conservancy letter to the governor urging preservation of the 5,800-acre Rockview property; the commission tabled signing the letter and supervisors discussed municipal reporting and limited authority over state property.
Elisse Johnson, Watershed Coordinator for the Keystone Water Resources Center and the Spring Creek Watershed Commission, updated Harris Township supervisors on community coordination about the future of the roughly 5,800-acre Rockview state property transferred recently to the Department of General Services.
Johnson said partners including Mount Nittany Conservancy, Clearwater Conservancy, the Farmland Trust and nearby municipalities prepared an environmental assessment mapping areas optimal for preservation and development. Clearwater Conservancy sent a letter to the governor calling for preserving mountain-top forestry, protecting prime farmland and groundwater recharge areas, creating a forested wildlife corridor to Mount Nittany, and requiring modern stormwater and sewage infrastructure to protect Spring Creek Canyon and its cold-water fishery.
Johnson told supervisors that when the Spring Creek Watershed Commission initially considered the letter, some township managers were concerned about authorship and authority; the commission ultimately tabled signing the letter to allow more municipal input. "The consensus seems to be most are very happy with us doing this," Johnson said, but she also described recommendations to develop a clearer community vision and technical advisory engagement with state decision-makers.
Supervisors and public commenters at the meeting weighed several local ideas — including trails, limited "leave no trace" camping, farming co-op concepts, and land swaps to assist generational farmers — but repeatedly noted the practical limits of municipal power because the tract is held by the state. Staff said the Watershed Commission will continue outreach and present options and proposed reporting intervals for municipalities to decide how they want ongoing updates.
Board members requested clearer, more prescriptive asks in future communications and discussed possible committee or planning-commission reports to keep municipalities informed. No binding municipal action was taken; the Watershed Commissionʼs letter remains an issue under discussion and additional community outreach is planned.
