Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance Enrollment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Brown Deer board flags budget shortfall as enrollment dips; limited virtual school floated to retain students

Brown Deer School Board · February 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented enrollment and revenue projections showing enrollment head count shifts and a possible $1.2 million revenue increase tied to vouchers, prompting discussion of potential budget cuts or an operational referendum and a proposal to recruit roughly 40 families back via a small-scale virtual program for grades 6–12.

Brown Deer School District officials told the school board that shifting enrollment and revenue uncertainty could force program cuts or an operational referendum. At the board’s regular meeting, business officer Mr. Paul said spring debt payments are “just over $2.5 million,” and presented enrollment projections that put the district’s three-year average full‑time‑equivalent enrollment near 1,708 and called out enrollment pressure from private‑school vouchers and open enrollment.

“The number is then used in our revenue formula,” Mr. Paul said while describing a projected head‑count increase that nonetheless leaves budget risks; he noted federal Title funding and state budget actions remain unclear. The presentation included a voucher‑related revenue estimate cited in the discussion at about $1,338,000 and an overall projected $1.2 million increase in revenues—amounts board members said may be offset by corresponding expenditure increases.

Board members and staff identified two near‑term responses: intensified outreach to families who have enrolled elsewhere and a proposal to pilot a virtual program for grades 6–12 intended to lure back families currently enrolled in virtual options. Board discussion referenced roughly 40 families identified as currently using virtual schooling in grades 6–12; administrators said the district would first attempt to recruit those families back before launching a full e‑school.

Mr. Dixon, presenting a staffing review, warned that staff costs constitute roughly 70% of district expenses and that a continuing enrollment decline could prompt reallocations. He provided a preliminary staffing snapshot showing roughly 83.25 elementary FTEs, 43.69 middle‑school FTEs and 26 high‑school teaching FTEs, and said some roles are being covered by overloads while a few non‑teaching positions remain deliberately unfilled.

Board members pressed staff on outreach, credit‑recovery and existing virtual credit platforms already in use for recovery and advancement. Several trustees emphasized community outreach—family nights and targeted calls to new residents—as a near‑term, lower‑cost strategy to stabilize head count.

Next steps: staff said they will refine enrollment and revenue projections, provide further analysis of virtual‑program feasibility, and return with budget scenarios; the board signaled that an operational referendum remains a potential option if numbers do not improve.