Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dual Enrollment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board agrees to cover certain dual‑enrollment tuitions, explores associate‑degree pathway

Massena Central School District Board of Education · May 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a recommendation to begin covering student tuition for select dual‑enrollment courses by routing costs through a regional early‑college cooperative; presenters said prior salary‑through‑cooperative arrangements brought roughly $175,000 in revenue and outlined an aspirational path for students to earn associate degrees with modest net costs to the district after reimbursement.

Mrs. Flynn and Mr. Oliver presented the board with the district’s plan to participate in a regional early college access cooperative (referred to in the meeting as a 'coser') that can handle student tuition and a portion of teacher salary costs associated with dual‑enrolled courses. Flynn described regional coordination, including a new regional coordinator (Alisa Sergy) acting as the liaison, and provided examples of partner colleges being used for dual credit.

Presenters spelled out concrete cost examples. They said Sunni Potsdam’s world‑language dual‑credit rate for the coming year will be $75 per course (down from $125); with 77 students enrolled in world‑language dual credit at that rate, the total upfront tuition would be $5,775. The cooperative would deliver roughly 80% in aid (presenters estimated a $4,620 reimbursement), leaving the district with a projected net cost of $1,155 for that example. Flynn and Oliver also described that running teacher salaries through the cooperative previously produced about $175,000 in revenue for the district.

The board discussed a longer‑term, aspirational goal wherein students could accumulate enough locally taught and cross‑listed dual credits to leave high school with an associate degree. Presenters cautioned that the associates pathway is exploratory and dependent on colleges’ acceptance of local course work; one illustrative price scenario showed a list price above $8,000 per student for the remaining credits with a projected net district cost per student (after reimbursement) of roughly $1,652.76 if the plan were implemented and approved by partner institutions.

Trustees asked practical questions about eligibility rules, potential academic consequences if students failed college‑level courses, counselor guidance, student workload for athletes and IB/AP students, and whether online options could expand access. Mr. Oliver said dual‑enrollment eligibility is typically based on enrollment in the course ("if you're in the class, you're eligible") and that he was not aware of local instances of students failing such classes. Trustees emphasized the need for guidance‑counselor involvement to help students plan schedules around college credit and extracurricular activities.

After discussion the board voted to approve the recommendation for the district to begin covering student tuition for selected dual‑enrollment courses and to use the early college access cooperative reimbursement process beginning in the 2026–27 school year. Trustees emphasized that next steps should include expanding staff cross‑listing of eligible courses, counselor outreach, and careful pacing of program growth to ensure sustainability.