Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the City Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oakdale council adopts FY 2025–26 midyear budget, maintains 40% reserve

Oakdale City Council · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a midyear budget resolution that updates revenues and projected expenditures and maintains a roughly 40% general-fund reserve; the motion passed by roll call, 5–0.

City staff presented the fiscal year 2025–26 midyear budget and the Oakdale City Council adopted a resolution approving the adjustments by a 5–0 roll-call vote.

Staff said the midyear budget adjusts projected revenues upward by about $36,000 and noted specific changes: a sales-tax projection increase described in the meeting as an increase of $50,000 and an upward revision in a safety-related sales-tax line from "2.6 to 2.8" as presented. The presenter reported projected general fund expenditures of about $18 million (an increase of about $50,000 from the preliminary budget) and an anticipated ending general fund balance of roughly $7.2 million, maintaining a city goal of a 40% reserve.

Staff outlined major allocations and increases since the preliminary budget, saying the police budget was about $7.6 million, fire about $5.4 million and park maintenance about $1.2 million. The presentation also summarized Measure Y/Measure H history: Measure Y was approved by voters in 2014; Measure H extended that sales-tax measure in 2019 and, as presented, continues the measure through March 31, 2031. Staff reported that more than 90% of Measure H revenue is used for public-safety services and provided the allocation breakdown presented at the meeting (about 59% to police, about 35% to fire and roughly 6.5% to other services).

The council moved and seconded the resolution and the clerk called the roll. The roll-call results as recorded at the meeting were: Council member Murdoch — yes; Mayor Prom Gilbert — yes; Council member Patassi — yes; Council member Katarine — yes; Mayor Barry — yes. The motion passed 5–0. The council did not attach amendments and staff recommended adoption as presented.

The council scheduled no additional action on the budget at the meeting; staff and the finance director were available to answer council questions during the presentation.