Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Eustis approves first readings for annexation and land-use changes for two parcels amid resident concerns
Summary
The City of Eustis approved first readings to annex roughly 10 acres and 2.8 acres near the County Road 44/44A intersection, changing future land-use designations and assigning Suburban Corridor design districts. Residents urged the city to preserve PUD restrictions and limit traffic and commercial impacts; staff said development agreements will carry use restrictions when annexation dissolves the county PUD.
The City Commission of Eustis on May 7 approved first readings for a package of ordinances to voluntarily annex roughly 10 acres (Lake County AK#1040141) and about 2.8 acres (AK#3959037) at the intersection of County Road 44 and County Road 44A and to change their future land-use designations and design-district assignments.
Jeff Richardson of development services presented the package and told commissioners that utilities are available to the sites, there are no flood-zone or wetland impacts, and that the requests conform with statutory indicators for annexation and comprehensive-plan consistency.
Resident Trina Marquez told the commission she objects to the proposed annexation and urged officials not to "turn an agriculture residential area into just another concrete jungle." She told commissioners to heed community concerns about overdevelopment and county approvals in neighboring jurisdictions. Donald Doyle, who lives just across the street from one parcel, said the staff report did not emphasize that the properties were part of a county PUD with more restrictive uses; he said county PUD limits (for example one dwelling unit per acre) differ from the urban-low designation cited in staff reports.
The property owner and applicant, Travis Sawchuk, said his design plan "exceeds greatly the minimum standards" and argued the proposed service-plaza-style development would diffuse traffic rather than create peak-period congestion. Staff clarified that a county PUD would dissolve upon annexation and that the development agreement accompanying annexation would be used to impose the use restrictions the community seeks to preserve.
Commissioners approved the first readings and associated design-district ordinances by roll call; staff said the second readings (and the combined development-agreement approvals) will return to the commission for final action after required re-advertising or documentation is completed.
The commission’s action on first reading does not itself change zoning or allow construction; the development agreement and second-reading ordinance package are required to bind future owners to the restrictions discussed.
