Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves condemnation of four Hobbs properties after owner’s representative asks for time to secure plans

Hobbs City Commission · March 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Hobbs City Commission voted unanimously to deem four properties dilapidated and begin the condemnation process. The owner’s representative requested a 366‑day extension and temporary permits for repairs, saying the owner is undergoing chemotherapy and that original architectural plans are missing.

The Hobbs City Commission voted unanimously to determine four properties as ruined, damaged and dilapidated and to begin the city's condemnation process. The properties named in the agenda were 104 East Hardin, 115 North Avenue B, 119 North Avenue B and 618 ½ East Snyder.

At the public hearing for Resolution 77‑38, the owner's representative, Zach Dathers, said the property owner could not attend because he is "currently undergoing chemotherapy" and asked the commission to consider an extension of 366 days to obtain required documentation and to allow temporary permits to replace damaged windows and doors. Dathers told the commission the structure at 104 East Hardin was "sound and solid," that theft and trespassing had damaged windows and doors, and that an absence of original architectural records complicated pulling permits.

City staff explained the legal and administrative steps: the condemnation process had been open for months for some parcels, staff had documented broken windows, fire damage and nuisance complaints, and the city follows a 10‑day objection period followed by a 30‑day period after which abatement actions can proceed, including asbestos inspection and abatement if necessary. Staff said the condemnation action is intended to compel remediation rather than immediate demolition.

Commissioners pressed about options for inspection and remediation; staff confirmed an interior inspection requires owner consent but said the building official determines allowable occupancy/classification under the International Building Code. Commissioners and staff discussed the property history, the difficulty of finding permits for older structures, and the possibility of assisting the owner with access to contractors or plan preparers. The commission then moved and seconded the condemnation determinations and approved them by roll call vote.

The action does not itself order demolition; rather it begins the statutory process that includes an objection window and potential abatement steps if the owner does not remediate. The owner’s representative indicated a willingness to work with the city and to pursue architectural plans and contractor quotes. City officials said they will stay in contact with the owner and the owner's agent about next steps.

The commission’s vote was procedural approval to advance the condemnation process and does not preclude bringing the matter back to the commission if remediation is completed or if the owner provides documentation.