Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves abatement resolutions for two dilapidated properties after public hearings

Luna County Board of County Commissioners
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After staff presented photographs, notices and records of delinquent taxes, the commission voted to approve nuisance‑abatement resolutions for properties at 5410 Kila Road (owned by Pedro Lara) and 3685 Overhill Drive (owned by Pamela Powell and Veronica Andrews).

County staff presented evidence and photographs showing long‑standing dilapidation, delinquent taxes and a lack of owner response for two properties and recommended the commission adopt resolutions authorizing nuisance abatement.

For the property at 5410 Kila Road (owner Pedro Lara), staff said code enforcement first identified the condition on July 19 and that multiple letters, a violation tag and a resolution letter had not produced contact from the owner. Staff recommended adoption of a resolution to authorize abatement of dangerous conditions that pose a public health and safety threat.

Similarly, staff presented materials for 3685 Overhill Drive (owners Pamela Powell and Veronica Andrews), describing the parcel’s identification in 2018, repeated code enforcement contacts since, delinquent taxes and photographs the county said show a severe dilapidated condition. Staff said proof of notice and publication are included in the record.

The commission called for motions and approved the respective abatement resolutions by roll call. Staff said the county will proceed under ordinance 74 (nuisance abatement) and pursue abatement if owners do not remedy conditions.

Why it matters: Nuisance abatement affects neighborhood safety, property values and health; the commission’s actions authorize county enforcement steps if owners do not comply.

Both public‑hearing items concluded with roll‑call motion approvals; no owner testimony was presented at the hearing.