Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves reappointments, inventory disposal resolution and bridge replacement contract
Summary
The commission approved two planning‑and‑zoning reappointments, adopted Resolution 4‑8‑26.11 to dispose county inventory items, and authorized the county manager to finalize a contract with Kimo Construction to replace Bridge No. 1787 on County Road 11 (near Cuba).
The Sandoval County Board of County Commissioners approved several routine actions during its April meeting, including two planning‑and‑zoning reappointments, a resolution to revise county inventory, and authorization of a professional services agreement for a bridge replacement.
Appointments: Director Beaman recommended reappointing Victor Rodriguez to the Sandoval County Planning Commission (seat for District 4) for a two‑year term beginning May 1, 2026. The commission moved, seconded and approved the reappointment by roll call.
Director Beaman also presented a second reappointment for Jerry Mangum to the Planning and Zoning Commission (District 3) for a two‑year term beginning May 1, 2026. That motion was likewise carried by roll call.
Resolution: Staff presented Resolution 4‑8‑26.11, described as a request to dispose, remove or revise items on the Sanoval County inventory/asset list. The board voted to adopt the resolution following a motion and second.
Contract: Dennis Byrne, project manager in Public Works, presented a request authorizing the county manager to approve a professional services agreement between Sanoval County and Kimo Construction to remove and replace Bridge Number 1787 on County Road 11 just south of the village of Cuba. Commissioners voiced appreciation for ongoing bridge work; the motion to authorize the manager to finalize the agreement passed on a roll call.
All recorded roll‑call items in the meeting were approved by the commissioners present. No votes failed or were postponed during the session.
Details: Terms of the contract with Kimo Construction, specific dollar amounts for the inventory disposal, and any procurement findings were not specified in the public remarks and were not read into the record at the meeting.
