Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tiovivo Pavilion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner urges permanent Tio Vivo carousel pavilion; board to stress‑test community benefit matrix
Summary
Commissioner Wayne Rutherford presented multiple site options and a $3–$5 million cost estimate for a permanent pavilion to house the historic Tio Vivo carousel, urging the MRA board to lend support and to use the project as a test case for the board’s community benefit matrix and decision guardrails.
Get email alerts on the Tiovivo Pavilion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner Wayne Rutherford presented a multi‑site plan to give the historic Tio Vivo carousel a permanent home downtown and described site options, infrastructure needs and rough cost expectations.
Rutherford said the highest‑visibility location is the mural corner at the intersection of Highway 64/68 and North Pueblo Road, but he also recommended parcels at the end of Civic Plaza Drive (Red Willow Park), a town parking lot on De Tevis Lane, a parcel behind the BRIC, and repurposing the old US Bank building as a potentially quicker, lower‑cost option. He estimated a pavilion could cost about $3 to $5 million depending on location and stressed the cultural value of protecting the carousel.
“We need about a 50 foot circle,” Rutherford said, describing structural and amenity requirements and noting that a bank building conversion could be a relatively fast option. Commissioners and community representatives supported using the community benefit matrix to stress‑test Tiovivo proposals and emphasized designing guardrails to avoid displacing legacy businesses and to root new work in local building traditions.
Why it matters: The carousel is a longstanding cultural asset and a permanent pavilion could increase year‑round use, local engagement and downtown visitation. The board encouraged the commissioner to continue developing options and asked staff to coordinate town leadership outreach to clarify ownership, permit and funding pathways. No formal endorsement or funding commitment was made at the meeting.
