Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alameda County identifies $91.4 million budget gap; CAO targets vacancies, revenue updates and Measure W receipts
Summary
County staff told the board they face a preliminary $91.4 million net funding gap for FY 2026-27 and have identified about $50 million in strategies so far, largely from updated revenue estimates and deletion of long-term vacant funded positions rather than salary cuts.
Alameda County staff on May 18 outlined a preliminary $91.4 million funding gap for fiscal year 2026-27 and described the package of strategies under consideration to close it.
Budget staff said the approved FY 2025-26 budget totals about $6.1 billion and general fund appropriations of approximately $4.3 billion. For FY 2026-27 the county's maintenance-of-effort baseline shows program appropriations rising roughly $78 million and total net county cost increases of about $76 million. Staff reported a preliminary funding gap of $91.4 million and said they have identified roughly $50 million of solutions so far.
The CAO's office and budget staff told supervisors the $50 million in identified strategies breaks down principally into updated revenue estimates (about $40 million), $3 million in ongoing cost reductions, $10 million in salary-and-benefit adjustments achieved largely by deleting long-term vacant funded positions, and $1 million in other solutions. Staff stressed that the salary-and-benefit figure reflects vacancy management and not cuts to incumbent employees' pay.
Supervisors pressed staff for more transparency about which vacant positions would be deleted and requested clearer departmental-level line items. President Halbert asked that budget presentations list prior-year actuals and headcount changes so the board and public can track which positions are truly being used as recurring savings. Budget staff said detailed position listings and authorized vs. funded headcounts appear in budget documents and that the CAO's office would identify recommended position changes as part of balancing strategies.
Community voices raised related concerns: a public commenter urged revisiting the Babu jail settlement, saying it requires staffing levels the county has not been able to fill and that those long-term vacant jail positions may artificially inflate budgeted staff counts. Another commenter from Restore Oakland urged the board to prioritize housing and noncarceral responses to reduce long-term costs.
Why it matters: with projected reductions in some state and federal supports and new administrative burdens from program changes, county departments and community partners face increased demand at a time when discretionary local revenue is relatively flat. Supervisors emphasized protecting the most vulnerable residents and sought more clarity before final decisions.
What happens next: staff will continue to refine revenue estimates, identify specific vacancy recommendations and return to the board during the May-June budget hearings; the proposed budget is scheduled for presentation May 28 and budget hearings open June 18.
