Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Pecos Council actions May 28, 2026
Summary
Council approved the consent agenda, authorized publication to pursue a tax‑abatement negotiation, approved museum funding (amended to $140,000), approved a zoning change and easement agreements, and directed staff on the train depot repairs; Item F‑7 was tabled and one item removed from the agenda.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its May 28 meeting the Pecos City Council took the following formal actions:
- Consent agenda (minutes, reporting): Approved by voice vote. - Item F‑8 — Motion to authorize publication of intent to enter into tax‑abatement negotiations with ITMO Midstream (set 30‑day public‑hearing period): Motion carried by voice vote. - Item F‑4 — West of the Pecos Museum funding: Motion to approve an amended total of $140,000 carried by voice vote; staff directed to seek ways to minimize HOT‑fund draw and to clarify parking‑lot reimbursement claims. - Item F‑5 — Zoning change at 427 North Ash Tree (C‑1 to R‑2): Motion to approve carried by voice vote; the existing commercial business on the block will be grandfathered. - Item F‑6 — Temporary and road easement agreements with Agua Blanca LLC for DVR expansion: Motion to approve the easement forms, terms and proposed fee (approx. $21,280.80) carried by voice vote. - Item F‑7 — Proposed amendment to EDC bylaws: Motion to table the item carried; council requested additional review and possible special meeting with EDC leadership. - Item F‑9 — Publication of intent for tax abatement with Spartan Canyon Enterprises: Removed from agenda (no action). - Item F‑10 — Train depot reconstruction resolution: Staff authorized to coordinate emergency repairs with the city’s insurance carrier and recommended contractor and directed to return in two weeks with additional TML/adjuster detail; motion carried by voice vote.
Notes: The transcript records voice votes and procedural motions but does not supply a full roll‑call tally for each item. Where council directed staff to return with additional information, those items remain contingent on follow‑up reporting and potential future votes.

